Diskussion:CryptoParty: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

aus Metalab, dem offenen Zentrum für meta-disziplinäre Magier und technisch-kreative Enthusiasten.
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Zeile 7: Zeile 7:
  
 
A lack of easy to discover peer review makes me rather sceptical. --[[Benutzer:Mzeltner|Mzeltner]] 19:50, 7. Nov. 2012 (CET)
 
A lack of easy to discover peer review makes me rather sceptical. --[[Benutzer:Mzeltner|Mzeltner]] 19:50, 7. Nov. 2012 (CET)
 +
 +
*The massive amount of different features, the full encryption of all connections, the fine granularity (i hope so) makes it interresting for me. This tool is not for Anonymization like TOR or JAP built. But encrypted communication and data sharing in a friend-to-friend/p2p network. I hope someone has some usage/admin-knowledge on retroshare and wants to explore its security and features with me. [[Benutzer:Cave|Cave]] 11:26, 8. Nov. 2012 (CET)

Version vom 8. November 2012, 11:26 Uhr

alles klar,

Retroshare als Punkt mit aufnehmen? http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroshare

mfg Cave 14:07, 7. Nov. 2012 (CET)

A lack of easy to discover peer review makes me rather sceptical. --Mzeltner 19:50, 7. Nov. 2012 (CET)

  • The massive amount of different features, the full encryption of all connections, the fine granularity (i hope so) makes it interresting for me. This tool is not for Anonymization like TOR or JAP built. But encrypted communication and data sharing in a friend-to-friend/p2p network. I hope someone has some usage/admin-knowledge on retroshare and wants to explore its security and features with me. Cave 11:26, 8. Nov. 2012 (CET)