Diskussion:Stable Diffusion: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Navi (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Navi (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
=== Ethical concerns should not be a side note === | === Ethical concerns should not be a side note === | ||
Especially when you're not forced to make these models work as part of receiving money, but when doing this in your free time, I think not just going "this is a cool technical thing" but rather on the implications, and on the intent of these models being released (for marketing agencies to replace artists for their ads! AI slop ads are getting real!). | Especially when you're not forced to make these models work as part of receiving money (due to day job is what I mean -- 22:14, 28. Feb. 2025 (CET)), but when doing this in your free time, I think not just going "this is a cool technical thing" but rather on the implications, and on the intent of these models being released (for marketing agencies to replace artists for their ads! AI slop ads are getting real!). | ||
I would also like to highlight the fact that it was pointing out ethical concerns that caused us to solicit art by actual artists for the MetaRave and giving them a few free drinks at the event as a thank you, beyond the very first edition, where we used a diffusion-generated poster, with minimal editing afterwards. [[Benutzer:Kescher|Kescher]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Kescher|Diskussion]]) 22:01, 28. Feb. 2025 (CET) | I would also like to highlight the fact that it was pointing out ethical concerns that caused us to solicit art by actual artists for the MetaRave and giving them a few free drinks at the event as a thank you, beyond the very first edition, where we used a diffusion-generated poster, with minimal editing afterwards. [[Benutzer:Kescher|Kescher]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Kescher|Diskussion]]) 22:01, 28. Feb. 2025 (CET) | ||
Version vom 28. Februar 2025, 21:14 Uhr
Ethical concerns should not be a side note
Especially when you're not forced to make these models work as part of receiving money (due to day job is what I mean -- 22:14, 28. Feb. 2025 (CET)), but when doing this in your free time, I think not just going "this is a cool technical thing" but rather on the implications, and on the intent of these models being released (for marketing agencies to replace artists for their ads! AI slop ads are getting real!).
I would also like to highlight the fact that it was pointing out ethical concerns that caused us to solicit art by actual artists for the MetaRave and giving them a few free drinks at the event as a thank you, beyond the very first edition, where we used a diffusion-generated poster, with minimal editing afterwards. Kescher (Diskussion) 22:01, 28. Feb. 2025 (CET)