Zum Inhalt springen

Metalab Services: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Reox (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Reckoner (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Zeile 39: Zeile 39:
** against [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - not because of technical reasons, but ones that I'd prefer Metalab not have infrastructure set up in which someone speaks for or as the organisation.
** against [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - not because of technical reasons, but ones that I'd prefer Metalab not have infrastructure set up in which someone speaks for or as the organisation.
** [[Benutzer:reox]] icbw but submission should be used for mailservers that hold mailboxes, not for relays. they should use port 25. only use it if pop/imap is implemented
** [[Benutzer:reox]] icbw but submission should be used for mailservers that hold mailboxes, not for relays. they should use port 25. only use it if pop/imap is implemented
** for [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - Could be just mail forwarding service without storage attached to mailbox.
* POP(110, 995) or IMAP(143, 993) Services?
* POP(110, 995) or IMAP(143, 993) Services?
** against [[Benutzer:hop]]
** against [[Benutzer:hop]]
** against [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - adding complexity
** against [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - adding complexity
** for [[Benutzer:red667]] -  mailserverice for members, so less people use gmail, hotmail, ... - cryptohardening is useless if the data is at a place without control
** for [[Benutzer:red667]] -  mailserverice for members, so less people use gmail, hotmail, ... - cryptohardening is useless if the data is at a place without control
** for [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - only in the form of super-encrypted paid-only mailboxes for paranoid members with funds going to Metalab support. 
* gitweb.cgi
* gitweb.cgi
** for [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - give people the option to avoid GitHub? Decentralised structure and all… With <code>git http-push</code> (WebDAV) support that uses the same credentials as the wiki or mos? Because we don't need lots of people with shell access.
** for [[Benutzer:mzeltner]] - give people the option to avoid GitHub? Decentralised structure and all… With <code>git http-push</code> (WebDAV) support that uses the same credentials as the wiki or mos? Because we don't need lots of people with shell access.
** for [[Benutzer:reox]]
** for [[Benutzer:reox]]
** against [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - using [https://github.com/metalab/ Github Metalab org. account] motivates people to participate in projects, provides better visibility.
* [http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-support_for_dkim_domainkeys_identified_mail.html DKIM]
* [http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-support_for_dkim_domainkeys_identified_mail.html DKIM]
** for [[Benutzer:mzeltner]]
** for [[Benutzer:mzeltner]]
** for [[Benutzer:reox]]
** for [[Benutzer:reox]]
** for [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - and SPF, and DMARC
* LDAP
* LDAP
** for [[Benutzer:red667]] - i now its a pain in the ass but would be beneficial for a lot of other services
** for [[Benutzer:red667]] - i now its a pain in the ass but would be beneficial for a lot of other services
 
** for [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - definitely
* MediaWiki
** for [[Benutzer:reckoner]] - Use MediaWiki as the only CMS for the website, including front-page, calendar and users. Leave MOS as legacy administration backend only.


Anything missing? Please [https://metalab.at/wiki/index.php?title=Metalab_Services&action=edit&section=1 add] it!
Anything missing? Please [https://metalab.at/wiki/index.php?title=Metalab_Services&action=edit&section=1 add] it!