Zum Inhalt springen

CCCamp2011: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

← Zum vorherigen VersionsunterschiedZum nächsten Versionsunterschied →
VisuellWikitext
Vandebina (Diskussion | Beiträge)
261 Bearbeitungen
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
MariusKintel (Diskussion | Beiträge)
688 Bearbeitungen
Zeile 40: Zeile 40:


After the success with the airborne glowsticks project (instantly dubbed the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHL1kTYbxds Flying Spaghetti Monster] on launch) at [[HAR2009]], I'm eager to discuss and launch another larger project at the CCCamp. No ideas yet, but I'd like to see a combination of some of the following: airborne, lighting, blinking, huge, complexity through organization of _lots_ of simpler objects, interactive?. Needs brainstorming, funding (the HAR project was ca. 500 EUR I think), prototyping, design, building. Alpha-testing at Stadtflucht 2011 is prob. a good idea. ([[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 14:22, 20. Aug. 2010 (CEST))
After the success with the airborne glowsticks project (instantly dubbed the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHL1kTYbxds Flying Spaghetti Monster] on launch) at [[HAR2009]], I'm eager to discuss and launch another larger project at the CCCamp. No ideas yet, but I'd like to see a combination of some of the following: airborne, lighting, blinking, huge, complexity through organization of _lots_ of simpler objects, interactive?. Needs brainstorming, funding (the HAR project was ca. 500 EUR I think), prototyping, design, building. Alpha-testing at Stadtflucht 2011 is prob. a good idea. ([[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 14:22, 20. Aug. 2010 (CEST))
** I did http://bit.ly/GodSees which was flying and had the chance to blink if I wanted it. HElium was the main ingrdients. This is an expensive and depleting natural resource, so I would hesitate to use HE again, rather go for a loooong stick or a quadcopter --[[Benutzer:Leobard|leobard]] 13:28, 30. Sep. 2010 (CEST)
* I did http://bit.ly/GodSees which was flying and had the chance to blink if I wanted it. HElium was the main ingrdients. This is an expensive and depleting natural resource, so I would hesitate to use HE again, rather go for a loooong stick or a quadcopter --[[Benutzer:Leobard|leobard]] 13:28, 30. Sep. 2010 (CEST)
*** How expensive is it to build simple swarming quadcopters? Maybe out of PCBs. What about a near space mission, I'd be interested in trying looooong distance wlan shooting using a mesh node in near space --[[Benutzer:Mihi|Mihi]] 16:13, 30. Sep. 2010 (CEST)
* I'd be in with brain and hand for another Flying Spaghetti Monster [[Benutzer:mind|mind]]
**** A much more interesting question would be: How much research and development does it take to build simple swarming quadcopters ;) After that, battery capacity would in any case be a major issue. ..and of course atmospheric pressure eventually. I've seen some companies researching miniature copters, but they all keep their IP (and physical hardware) close to their chests. [[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 18:39, 1. Okt. 2010 (CEST)
 
***** Indeed, however there are the DIYdrones folks who seem to have some quadcopter autopilot stuff running. However we want to scale it down (IMO). Could we try to get auto piloting quadcopters first? Or quadcopters at all (I know there is one around in the lab). --[[Benutzer:Mihi|Mihi]] 13:39, 2. Okt. 2010 (CEST)
==== Swarming quadrocopters ====
****** I've got a quadrocopter at the lab. Needs new batteries, plus it's not too easy to control, and not auto piloting. I believe Funkfeuer has one as well. check uavp.ch, who do open source control electronics, and microkopter.de who do proprietary "shared source" stuff. The "scale down" part and the positioning awareness needed for swarming is what would require significant amounts of R&D IMO. [[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 15:18, 3. Okt. 2010 (CEST)
* How expensive is it to build simple swarming quadcopters? Maybe out of PCBs. What about a near space mission, I'd be interested in trying looooong distance wlan shooting using a mesh node in near space --[[Benutzer:Mihi|Mihi]] 16:13, 30. Sep. 2010 (CEST)
******* I'd be in with brain and hand for another Flying Spaghetti Monster [[Benutzer:mind|mind]]
** A much more interesting question would be: How much research and development does it take to build simple swarming quadcopters ;) After that, battery capacity would in any case be a major issue. ..and of course atmospheric pressure eventually. I've seen some companies researching miniature copters, but they all keep their IP (and physical hardware) close to their chests. [[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 18:39, 1. Okt. 2010 (CEST)
** Indeed, however there are the DIYdrones folks who seem to have some quadcopter autopilot stuff running. However we want to scale it down (IMO). Could we try to get auto piloting quadcopters first? Or quadcopters at all (I know there is one around in the lab). --[[Benutzer:Mihi|Mihi]] 13:39, 2. Okt. 2010 (CEST)
** I've got a quadrocopter at the lab. Needs new batteries, plus it's not too easy to control, and not auto piloting. I believe Funkfeuer has one as well. check uavp.ch, who do open source control electronics, and microkopter.de who do proprietary "shared source" stuff. The "scale down" part and the positioning awareness needed for swarming is what would require significant amounts of R&D IMO. [[Benutzer:MariusKintel|MariusKintel]] 15:18, 3. Okt. 2010 (CEST)


==== META-Dome ====
==== META-Dome ====
Abgerufen von „https://metalab.at/alpakaparty/CCCamp2011“