Kinky Stardust (Acoustic Guitar Pickup): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Amir (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Amir (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 29: | Zeile 29: | ||
===== Research on existing pickups ===== | ===== Research on existing pickups ===== | ||
So, i did some research on usual pickup technologies and guess what i found? None of them really met my specifications. Also existing DIY solutions tended to fail my specifications utterly | So, i did some research on usual pickup technologies and guess what i found? None of them really met my specifications. Also existing DIY solutions tended to fail my specifications utterly | ||
and were mostly very crude (gluing a piezo directly to guitar - seriously?). Well, after ruling out picking the sound up from the strings directly i saw two options: Picking up vibrations | and were mostly very crude (gluing a piezo transducer directly to guitar and drilling holes in my guitar - seriously?). Well, after ruling out picking the sound up from the strings directly i saw two options: Picking up vibrations | ||
of the corpus directly (e.g contact mic) or picking up "airborne" sonics (e.g. classic microphone). Both have their pros and cons: e.g a contact mic has a very low susceptibility to background | of the corpus directly (e.g contact mic) or picking up "airborne" sonics (e.g. classic microphone). Both have their pros and cons: e.g a contact mic has a very low susceptibility to background | ||
noise whereas a classic microphone is more true to the sound of the guitar. That ment i needed a third option - a mix of both techniques. I investigated different designs for acoustic | noise whereas a classic microphone is more true to the sound of the guitar. That ment i needed a third option - a mix of both techniques. I investigated different designs for acoustic | ||